GAYA RAM DUBEY (PETITIONER IN PERSON) PETITIONER IN PERSON vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/4450/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010211802026

Filing Number

WPS/12206/2026

Filing Date

23-May-2026

Registration No

WPS/4450/2026

Registration Date

29-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

TRANSFER MATTERS. ( 617 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GAYA RAM DUBEY (PETITIONER IN PERSON) PETITIONER IN PERSON

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Sanyukt Sanchalak

  3. 3.Jila Panchayat Durg

  4. 4.Jila Shiksha Adhikari

  5. 5.Jila Shiksha Adhikari

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

    Case Summary: WPS/4450/2026 Gaya Ram Dubey, a Sanskrit lecturer, challenged his transfer from Kumudkatta (Balod district) to Markeli (Mohla-Manpur-Ambagarh Chowki), citing hardship as his children study in Bhilai, 150km away. The court disposed the petition after the State's counsel agreed to consider his April 2026 transfer representation, directing the respondent to decide within 45 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

  4. 23-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/4450/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPS/4450/2026 Gaya Ram Dubey, a Sanskrit lecturer, challenged his transfer from Kumudkatta (Balod district) to Markeli (Mohla-Manpur-Ambagarh Chowki), citing hardship as his children study in Bhilai, 150km away. The court disposed the petition after the State's counsel agreed to consider his April 2026 transfer representation, directing the respondent to decide within 45 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case