JUGAL KISHORE TIWARI vs RAVINDRA KUMAR SAO — CRR/708/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010211772026

Filing Number

CRR/8973/2026

Filing Date

23-May-2026

Registration No

CRR/708/2026

Registration Date

29-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO SECTION 138 OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT. ( 1427 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JUGAL KISHORE TIWARI

    Adv. Swayam Tehanguria,MUKESH SHARMA,MUKESH SHARMA, NEHA MISHRA,MUKESH SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAVINDRA KUMAR SAO

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

    Case Summary: CRR 708/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh (02/06/2026) heard Jugal Kishore Tiwari's petition regarding a Negotiable Instruments Act conviction. The Appellate Court had set aside the six-month sentence but affirmed the compensation award. The Court directed the matter be listed in the first week of July 2026 to allow the petitioner reasonable time to deposit the compensation. Notice was issued to respondent Ravindra Kumar Sao; the urgent hearing application was disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

  4. 23-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRR/708/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRR 708/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh (02/06/2026) heard Jugal Kishore Tiwari's petition regarding a Negotiable Instruments Act conviction. The Appellate Court had set aside the six-month sentence but affirmed the compensation award. The Court directed the matter be listed in the first week of July 2026 to allow the petitioner reasonable time to deposit the compensation. Notice was issued to respondent Ravindra Kumar Sao; the urgent hearing application was disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case