SMT. POORNIMA UPADHYAY vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH — WPS/4440/2026

Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Next hearing 17-Jun-2026

CNR: CGHC010211302026

Filing Number

WPS/12181/2026

Filing Date

22-May-2026

Registration No

WPS/4440/2026

Registration Date

25-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

TRANSFER MATTERS. ( 617 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 30-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. POORNIMA UPADHYAY

    Adv. C. JAYANT K. RAO,VIVEK KUMAR YADAV,VIVEK KUMAR YADAV, ,SAHDEV YADAV,C. Shravanti,KAUSHAL YADAV,VIVEK KUMAR YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

  2. 2.Under Secretary,

  3. 3.Director,

  4. 4.District Programme Officer,

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  3. 29-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

    Case Summary: WPS 4440/2026 Smt. Poornima Upadhyay challenged her transfer order from Bilaspur to Bijapur (546 km away), citing her 42% permanent disability status. The court found merit in her contention that state policy requires disabled employees to be posted near their home district to minimize hardship. The case was adjourned to June 17, 2026, with directions to the State to file an affidavit explaining the transfer policy for physically challenged employees and whether the petitioner can be accommodated at Bilaspur or a nearby location. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 29-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 22-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/4440/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPS 4440/2026 Smt. Poornima Upadhyay challenged her transfer order from Bilaspur to Bijapur (546 km away), citing her 42% permanent disability status. The court found merit in her contention that state policy requires disabled employees to be posted near their home district to minimize hardship. The case was adjourned to June 17, 2026, with directions to the State to file an affidavit explaining the transfer policy for physically challenged employees and whether the petitioner can be accommodated at Bilaspur or a nearby location. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case