PRAYAS BAKRE vs VISHAL AGRAWAL Advocate - PRAVIN KUMAR TULSYAN, ,AISHWARYA PANDEY — CRMP/1517/2019
Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 01st April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010211162019
Filing Number
CRMP/8989/2019
Filing Date
25-Jun-2019
Registration No
CRMP/1517/2019
Registration Date
27-Jun-2019
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
APPLICATION U/S 528 OF B.N.S.S. 2023 ( 1411 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRAYAS BAKRE
Adv. DEEPALI PANDEY,UMA PATEL,UMA PATEL, ,RAMAKANT MISHRA,RAMAKANT MISHRA,UMA PATEL
-
2.Hiralal Dewangan
Respondent(s)
-
1.VISHAL AGRAWAL Advocate - PRAVIN KUMAR TULSYAN, ,AISHWARYA PANDEY
-
2.Pawan Kumar Agrawal
Adv. Ankit Pandey,ANIL PANDEY SEEMA SAHU MANEESH BHARDWAJ
-
3.Krishna Kumar Agrawal
-
4.Dev Singh Uike
Adv. GOUTAM KHETRAPAL,AVINASH CHAND SAHU SANJAY KUMAR AGRAWAL L Kapil Maini RESHAM LAL JAISWAL SHANTANU PARMANAND
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF
The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the petitioners' criminal revision petition (CRMP No. 1517 of 2019) challenging the framing of charges under Section 323/34 IPC as infructuous, since the trial in the underlying complaint case was already ongoing. The court held that the petition had lost its purpose once the trial commenced. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Aug-2019
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar GuptaView PDF
-
02-Jul-2019
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar GuptaView PDF
-
02-Jul-2019
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta
-
25-Jun-2019
Case filed
Registration No. CRMP/1517/2019
The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the petitioners' criminal revision petition (CRMP No. 1517 of 2019) challenging the framing of charges under Section 323/34 IPC as infructuous, since the trial in the underlying complaint case was already ongoing. The court held that the petition had lost its purpose once the trial commenced. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts