SAHJAAN KHAN vs STATE OF C.G. Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/5316/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010210622026

Filing Number

MCRC/8911/2026

Filing Date

21-May-2026

Registration No

MCRC/5316/2026

Registration Date

16-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

NDPS Act ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAHJAAN KHAN

    Adv. VIKASH A.SHRIVASTAVA,PRAGYA SHRIVASTAVA,PRAGYA SHRIVASTAVA, ,Santosh Bharat,PRAGYA SHRIVASTAVA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF C.G. Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court granted bail to Sahjaan Khan, arrested for allegedly possessing 56 capsules of Spasmo Proxyvon Plus (containing tramadol) under Section 22(B) of the NDPS Act. The court found that the recovered quantity was below commercial limits, the chargesheet had already been filed, and the applicant had undergone substantial incarceration since January 2026. Bail was granted with conditions including personal bond with two sureties, mandatory court attendance, and restrictions on seeking adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 21-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/5316/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court granted bail to Sahjaan Khan, arrested for allegedly possessing 56 capsules of Spasmo Proxyvon Plus (containing tramadol) under Section 22(B) of the NDPS Act. The court found that the recovered quantity was below commercial limits, the chargesheet had already been filed, and the applicant had undergone substantial incarceration since January 2026. Bail was granted with conditions including personal bond with two sureties, mandatory court attendance, and restrictions on seeking adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case