NEHA SHARMA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/5051/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 04th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010210172026

Filing Number

MCRC/8888/2026

Filing Date

21-May-2026

Registration No

MCRC/5051/2026

Registration Date

02-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NEHA SHARMA

    Adv. SANJAY AGRAWAL,KRISHNA TANDON,KRISHNA TANDON, ,NEELAM KHAN,VIDHI MATLANI,VIDHI MATLANI,ANANYA TIWARI,SHRUTI SHRIVASTAVA,KRISHNA TANDON

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC/5051/2026 Decision: The Chhattisgarh High Court granted bail to Neha Sharma, accused of theft of jewelry worth Rs. 12,27,000 from her employer's house. The court found that no stolen articles were recovered from the applicant, co-accused persons were already granted bail, the chargesheet was filed, and prolonged incarceration was unjustified given the trial's expected duration. Conditions: Bail was granted on a personal bond with two sureties, requiring the applicant to remain present at all trial dates, not seek adjournments during evidence, and comply with court directions or face contempt proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

  4. 21-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/5051/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC/5051/2026 Decision: The Chhattisgarh High Court granted bail to Neha Sharma, accused of theft of jewelry worth Rs. 12,27,000 from her employer's house. The court found that no stolen articles were recovered from the applicant, co-accused persons were already granted bail, the chargesheet was filed, and prolonged incarceration was unjustified given the trial's expected duration. Conditions: Bail was granted on a personal bond with two sureties, requiring the applicant to remain present at all trial dates, not seek adjournments during evidence, and comply with court directions or face contempt proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case