DEBASHISH MEHER OFFICE REFERENCE, ,Chandradeep Prasad,MOHAMMAD AFROZ ATHAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/1463/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010209592026

Filing Number

CRMP/8858/2026

Filing Date

20-May-2026

Registration No

CRMP/1463/2026

Registration Date

21-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO RESTORATION / MODIFICATION / EXTENSION OF TIME IN DECIDED CRIMINAL CASE ( 1450 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEBASHISH MEHER OFFICE REFERENCE, ,Chandradeep Prasad,MOHAMMAD AFROZ ATHAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court granted a 4-month extension (instead of the requested 6 months) to the trial court to conclude the NDPS Act case against petitioner Debashish Meher. The trial court cited unexecuted witness warrants preventing completion of prosecution evidence as justification for the extension to record remaining witness statements, examine the accused, and pronounce judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 20-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMP/1463/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court granted a 4-month extension (instead of the requested 6 months) to the trial court to conclude the NDPS Act case against petitioner Debashish Meher. The trial court cited unexecuted witness warrants preventing completion of prosecution evidence as justification for the extension to record remaining witness statements, examine the accused, and pronounce judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case