ASHOK KUMAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3970/2025

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010208822025

Filing Number

WPS/12122/2025

Filing Date

28-May-2025

Registration No

WPS/3970/2025

Registration Date

28-May-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

SELECTION, APPOINTMENT & RECRUITMENT INCLUDING EXAMINATION, INTERVIEW. ( 614 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHOK KUMAR

    Adv. BHASKAR PAYASHI,DINESH YADAV,DINESH YADAV, ,RAJ SHENGALE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Principal Chief Conservator of Forest

  3. 3.Chief Conservator of Forest

  4. 4.Director

  5. 5.Arpan Kumar

  6. 6.Arjun Ram Tirki

  7. 7.Rajeev Vishwakarma

  8. 8.Police Station Churcha

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Case Summary: In WPS 3970/2025, the High Court of Chhattisgarh adjourned the hearing on 16/04/2026 after the petitioner's counsel requested short time, citing unavailability of the arguing counsel. The case was listed for hearing after four weeks without any substantive order on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  4. 16-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  6. 10-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  7. 03-Jun-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar VermaView PDF

  8. 03-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 28-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3970/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In WPS 3970/2025, the High Court of Chhattisgarh adjourned the hearing on 16/04/2026 after the petitioner's counsel requested short time, citing unavailability of the arguing counsel. The case was listed for hearing after four weeks without any substantive order on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case