RAMVILAS MARKAM vs THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/2673/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010208502026

Filing Number

WPC/12040/2026

Filing Date

19-May-2026

Registration No

WPC/2673/2026

Registration Date

22-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMVILAS MARKAM

    Adv. RISHIKANT MAHOBIA,SHRIKANT KAUSHIK,SHRIKANT KAUSHIK, ,DIVYANAND PATEL,SHRIKANT KAUSHIK

  2. 2.Kapil Dev Singh

  3. 3.Ramsingh

  4. 4.Sohan Singh

  5. 5.Vijay Singh

  6. 6.Bhagirathi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.The Additional Commissioner

  3. 3.The Collector

  4. 4.The Sub Divisional Officer (R)

  5. 5.Tahsildhar

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

    Case Summary: On 18/06/2026, the High Court of Chhattisgarh recused Judge Amitendra Kishore Prasad from hearing WPC No. 2673 of 2026 due to a conflict of interest—the judge had previously appeared on behalf of one of the parties. The case was adjourned and directed to be listed before an appropriate bench without this judge, following nomination by the Chief Justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  4. 26-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  5. 26-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 19-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/2673/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: On 18/06/2026, the High Court of Chhattisgarh recused Judge Amitendra Kishore Prasad from hearing WPC No. 2673 of 2026 due to a conflict of interest—the judge had previously appeared on behalf of one of the parties. The case was adjourned and directed to be listed before an appropriate bench without this judge, following nomination by the Chief Justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case