RAMESH SINGH SHRINET vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/4422/2022

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010207782022

Filing Number

WPS/11384/2022

Filing Date

23-Jun-2022

Registration No

WPS/4422/2022

Registration Date

25-Jun-2022

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES ( 630 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMESH SINGH SHRINET

    Adv. DHEERENDRA PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.District and Session Judge

    Adv. ABHIJEET MISHRA

  3. 3.District and Session Judge

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

    The Chhattisgarh High Court allowed the petition and quashed recovery orders issued against a Class-IV employee (Process Server) for Rs. 38,928 in excess salary paid over 16 years. The court applied the Supreme Court's *State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih* principle, which prohibits recovery from Class III-IV employees when excess payment spans over five years and no misrepresentation occurred, finding the recovery iniquitous given the 16-year delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Sep-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh ChandelView PDF

  4. 27-Feb-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  5. 12-Oct-2022

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  6. 23-Aug-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  7. 25-Jul-2022

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant

  8. 28-Jun-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh SamantView PDF

  9. 28-Jun-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 23-Jun-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/4422/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The Chhattisgarh High Court allowed the petition and quashed recovery orders issued against a Class-IV employee (Process Server) for Rs. 38,928 in excess salary paid over 16 years. The court applied the Supreme Court's *State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih* principle, which prohibits recovery from Class III-IV employees when excess payment spans over five years and no misrepresentation occurred, finding the recovery iniquitous given the 16-year delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case