KISHORE CHANDRA RATH vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRCA/807/2026
Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th June 2026.
CNR: CGHC010207672026
Filing Number
MCRCA/8786/2026
Filing Date
19-May-2026
Registration No
MCRCA/807/2026
Registration Date
19-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
Other ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
18-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KISHORE CHANDRA RATH
Adv. TAPAN KUMAR CHANDRA,Bhaskar Jha,Bhaskar Jha, ,DEEPAK KUMAR KUSHWAHA,PARTH KUMAR JHA,Narayan Prasad Thakur,Narayan Prasad Thakur,Bhaskar Jha
-
2.Smt Manjulata Rath
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Jun-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
Case Summary: MCRCA/807/2026 Decision: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted anticipatory bail to Kishore Chandra Rath and Smt Manjulata Rath in a financial fraud case involving Soul Art of Finance Company Pvt. Ltd., where Rs. 22.30 lakh was allegedly invested with forged FDR documents. Key Reasoning: The court found allegations against the applicants were based primarily on their directorship of the company, with no specific evidence showing they personally received the invested amounts. Considering their age (67 and 57 years), health conditions, and low flight/tampering risk, custodial interrogation appeared unnecessary. The court noted the main accused had already received regular bail, strengthening the case for anticipatory bail to the applicants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jun-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
-
19-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MCRCA/807/2026
Case Summary: MCRCA/807/2026 Decision: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted anticipatory bail to Kishore Chandra Rath and Smt Manjulata Rath in a financial fraud case involving Soul Art of Finance Company Pvt. Ltd., where Rs. 22.30 lakh was allegedly invested with forged FDR documents. Key Reasoning: The court found allegations against the applicants were based primarily on their directorship of the company, with no specific evidence showing they personally received the invested amounts. Considering their age (67 and 57 years), health conditions, and low flight/tampering risk, custodial interrogation appeared unnecessary. The court noted the main accused had already received regular bail, strengthening the case for anticipatory bail to the applicants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts