SMT ANJU JAISWAL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/4556/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010207302026

Filing Number

WPS/11949/2026

Filing Date

18-May-2026

Registration No

WPS/4556/2026

Registration Date

16-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

SUSPENSION. ( 604 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT ANJU JAISWAL

    Adv. A.N.PANDEY,SMT. SAPNA PANDEY,SMT. SAPNA PANDEY, SMT. SAPNA PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Director

  3. 3.Joint Director- Education

  4. 4.Collector- Balrampur

  5. 5.District Education Officer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    Case Summary: WPS/4556/2026 - Smt Anju Jaiswal v. State of Chhattisgarh The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the petition without ruling on merits, directing the suspended Assistant Teacher to file a fresh representation before the Director of Public Instruction within 15 days, which must be decided within 30 days. The court noted the suspension had exceeded 90 days without departmental proceeding progress but allowed the administrative process to continue rather than intervening directly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

  4. 18-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/4556/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPS/4556/2026 - Smt Anju Jaiswal v. State of Chhattisgarh The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the petition without ruling on merits, directing the suspended Assistant Teacher to file a fresh representation before the Director of Public Instruction within 15 days, which must be decided within 30 days. The court noted the suspension had exceeded 90 days without departmental proceeding progress but allowed the administrative process to continue rather than intervening directly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case