SMT MUSKAAN SIDDIQUI vs BANK OF BARODA — WPC/2633/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 21st May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010206242026

Filing Number

WPC/11899/2026

Filing Date

18-May-2026

Registration No

WPC/2633/2026

Registration Date

19-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MERCANTILE LAWS, COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS INCLUDING BANKING ( 21 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO RECOVERY OF DEBTS/BANK LOANS DUE UNDER THE BANKS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS. ( 2108 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

21-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 29-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT MUSKAAN SIDDIQUI

    Adv. HARSH VERMA,MAHIMA CHANDRA,MAHIMA CHANDRA, ,NAITIKA SAHU,ASTHA PATEL,ANUSHKA SINGH CHOUHAN,MAHIMA CHANDRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BANK OF BARODA

  2. 2.Tehsildar, Raipur,

    Adv. A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of Smt Muskaan Siddiqui's writ petition against Bank of Baroda and the Tehsildar, Raipur, granting her liberty to approach the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad for redressal of her grievance. The court declined to adjudicate the matter itself and directed the Appellate Tribunal to expeditiously consider and address her complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  4. 19-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  5. 19-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 18-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/2633/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of Smt Muskaan Siddiqui's writ petition against Bank of Baroda and the Tehsildar, Raipur, granting her liberty to approach the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad for redressal of her grievance. The court declined to adjudicate the matter itself and directed the Appellate Tribunal to expeditiously consider and address her complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case