BHUPENDRA SAHU vs DEENBANDHU DHRUW — CONT/732/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010205902026

Filing Number

CONT/11870/2026

Filing Date

15-May-2026

Registration No

CONT/732/2026

Registration Date

23-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONTEMPT OF COURT MATTERS ( 16 )

Sub-Category

OTHER CIVIL CONTEMPT MATTERS ( 1603 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHUPENDRA SAHU

    Adv. Varsha Sharma,SANDEEP K SHARMA,SANDEEP K SHARMA, ,Smt Deepa Ramteke

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DEENBANDHU DHRUW

  2. 2.Dimple Dhruw

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    CONT /732/2026 - SUMMARY Bhupendra Sahu's contempt petition against Deenbandhu Dhruw (GM, DTIC) and Dimple Dhruw (Tahsildar) was dismissed. Sahu alleged the Tahsildar was proceeding with dispossession despite prior court orders. However, the court found no contempt because the Tahsildar was acting in compliance with liberty granted by the court in an earlier writ petition (W.P.(C) No. 1867/2020) to proceed under Section 248 of CGLRC, 1959. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

  4. 15-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CONT/732/2026

casestatus.in Summary

CONT /732/2026 - SUMMARY Bhupendra Sahu's contempt petition against Deenbandhu Dhruw (GM, DTIC) and Dimple Dhruw (Tahsildar) was dismissed. Sahu alleged the Tahsildar was proceeding with dispossession despite prior court orders. However, the court found no contempt because the Tahsildar was acting in compliance with liberty granted by the court in an earlier writ petition (W.P.(C) No. 1867/2020) to proceed under Section 248 of CGLRC, 1959. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case