M/S SHRI GOLDAN TRANSPORT vs KARNATAKA BANK — WPC/2677/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 29th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010205682026

Filing Number

WPC/11850/2026

Filing Date

15-May-2026

Registration No

WPC/2677/2026

Registration Date

22-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MERCANTILE LAWS, COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS INCLUDING BANKING ( 21 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO RECOVERY OF DEBTS/BANK LOANS DUE UNDER THE BANKS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS. ( 2108 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

29-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 30-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S SHRI GOLDAN TRANSPORT

    Adv. TARUN DANSENA

  2. 2.Nand Kumar Tamrakar

  3. 3.Devendra Tamrakar

  4. 4.Smt. Mithila Tamrakar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KARNATAKA BANK

  2. 2.Karnataka Bank Ltd. Through Asset Recovery Management Branch

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition filed by M/S Shri Goldan Transport and others challenging Karnataka Bank's sale notice for property auction to recover Rs. 57,55,540.3/-, finding the petitioners adopted delay tactics by filing the petition on the auction date despite notice issued on 02.05.2026. The court rejected interim relief as petitioners lacked clean hands and could not deposit Rs. 30,00,000/- interim security, holding the case unfit for extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  4. 15-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/2677/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition filed by M/S Shri Goldan Transport and others challenging Karnataka Bank's sale notice for property auction to recover Rs. 57,55,540.3/-, finding the petitioners adopted delay tactics by filing the petition on the auction date despite notice issued on 02.05.2026. The court rejected interim relief as petitioners lacked clean hands and could not deposit Rs. 30,00,000/- interim security, holding the case unfit for extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case