SUKHNATH NAG MANISH MISHRA (LEGAL AID) vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH — WPCR/296/2026
Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th June 2026.
CNR: CGHC010205082026
Filing Number
WPCR/11821/2026
Filing Date
15-May-2026
Registration No
WPCR/296/2026
Registration Date
21-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES ( 1440 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
18-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUKHNATH NAG MANISH MISHRA (LEGAL AID)
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
-
2.The Collector And District Magistrate,
-
3.The Superintendent Of Jail, Central Jail Ambikapur,
-
4.The Superintendent Of Jail Central Jail Bilaspur,
-
5.The Station House Officer Police Station, Pattalgaon,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Jun-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
CASE SUMMARY: WPCR/296/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the petition of Sukhnath Nag, convicted of child abduction and sexual offences under IPC Sections 363, 366 and POCSO Act Section 6, who sought to challenge the District Magistrate's rejection of his parole application dated 20.02.2026. The Court upheld the rejection, finding it justified based on the gravity of the offences, valid apprehensions expressed by the victim's family regarding threat to their lives, and documented concerns about prisoners absconding after parole misuse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jun-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
-
15-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPCR/296/2026
CASE SUMMARY: WPCR/296/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the petition of Sukhnath Nag, convicted of child abduction and sexual offences under IPC Sections 363, 366 and POCSO Act Section 6, who sought to challenge the District Magistrate's rejection of his parole application dated 20.02.2026. The Court upheld the rejection, finding it justified based on the gravity of the offences, valid apprehensions expressed by the victim's family regarding threat to their lives, and documented concerns about prisoners absconding after parole misuse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts