LEELA BAI BANJARE vs THE STATE GOVT. OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,SANDEEP DUBEY — WPS/4548/2022

Case under An Appeal U/s 82 of Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 12th May 2026.

CNR: CGHC010204152022

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WPS/11171/2022

Filing Date

21-06-2022

Registration No

WPS/4548/2022

Registration Date

29-06-2022

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

DATE OF BIRTH ( 623 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

12th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

An Appeal U/s 82 of Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 Section 227

Petitioner(s)

LEELA BAI BANJARE

Adv. AJAY SHRIVASTAVA,SATYA KUMAR MANDLOI,SATYA KUMAR MANDLOI, ,BARUN KUMAR CHAKRABARTY,G.P.MATHUR,VINOD KUMAR SHARMA,SATYA KUMAR MANDLOI

Respondent(s)

THE STATE GOVT. OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,SANDEEP DUBEY

Director,

Municipal Corporation

Adv. Alok Chandra Rishi,Pragati Kaushik MANAS VAJPAI SUNITA JAIN

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

01-07-2022

FRESH MATTERS

12-05-2026

MOTION HEARING MATTERS

23-08-2022

FRESH MATTERS

Orders

12-05-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Case Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition filed by Leela Bai Banjare against the State Government and Municipal Corporation of Rajnandgaon. The court found the petition had become infructuous (lacking purpose/remedy) by efflux of time, as conceded by the petitioner's counsel, and therefore dismissed it on 12.05.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition filed by Leela Bai Banjare against the State Government and Municipal Corporation of Rajnandgaon. The court found the petition had become infructuous (lacking purpose/remedy) by efflux of time, as conceded by the petitioner's counsel, and therefore dismissed it on 12.05.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case