RAJESH JAMRE OFFICE REFERENCE, ,Ramayan Yadav,VIKHYAT ARORA,Jai Prakash Tiwari,ANKUR DIWAN vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/1435/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010203932026

Filing Number

CRMP/8651/2026

Filing Date

14-May-2026

Registration No

CRMP/1435/2026

Registration Date

15-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO RESTORATION / MODIFICATION / EXTENSION OF TIME IN DECIDED CRIMINAL CASE ( 1450 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJESH JAMRE OFFICE REFERENCE, ,Ramayan Yadav,VIKHYAT ARORA,Jai Prakash Tiwari,ANKUR DIWAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: CRMP 1435/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of this office reference by granting the trial court's request for a three-month time extension to conclude the trial of Rajesh Jamre. The case is at the prosecution evidence stage, with remaining prosecution evidence and defense evidence still pending. The court found the extension request reasonable given the case's procedural status and directed the trial court to complete the trial as expeditiously as possible within the extended three-month period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 14-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMP/1435/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRMP 1435/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of this office reference by granting the trial court's request for a three-month time extension to conclude the trial of Rajesh Jamre. The case is at the prosecution evidence stage, with remaining prosecution evidence and defense evidence still pending. The court found the extension request reasonable given the case's procedural status and directed the trial court to complete the trial as expeditiously as possible within the extended three-month period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case