JASBIR SINGH MAKKAD vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,RAVI KUMAR BHAGAT — WPC/2826/2022

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010203412022

Filing Number

WPC/11122/2022

Filing Date

21-Jun-2022

Registration No

WPC/2826/2022

Registration Date

27-Jun-2022

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JASBIR SINGH MAKKAD

    Adv. Deepali Dubey,SURFARAJ KHAN,SURFARAJ KHAN, ,RISHI SAHU,SURFARAJ KHAN

  2. 2.Jasmeet Sing Makkad @ Badal Makkad

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,RAVI KUMAR BHAGAT

  2. 2.Sub Divisional Offcer (Revenue) Mahasamund

  3. 3.Chhattisgarh State Scheduled Caste Commission Raipur

    Adv. ADIL MINHAJ

  4. 4.Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Welfare Police Station

  5. 5.Vikash Kumar (Genda) @ Vikas Kumar Kshatriya

    Adv. Sareena Khan,SEEMA MISHRA SANGEETA KAUSHIK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

    Case Summary: WPC 2826/2022 Court Decision: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the petition challenging a bailable warrant issued by the Chhattisgarh State Scheduled Caste Commission. The court held that the Commission possesses statutory powers under Section 10 of the Act, 1995 to issue warrants as it has all civil court powers, and thus could lawfully issue the warrant to secure petitioner's attendance after repeated summons defaults. Key Reasoning: Section 10 of the Chhattisgarh Rajya Anusuchit Jati Ayog Adhiniyam, 1995 vests the Commission with civil court powers, including enforcing attendance through warrants under CPC Section 32. The warrant was issued only to secure presence for evidence recording, not for adjudication, making it legally valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Jun-2025

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

  4. 25-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

  5. 22-Aug-2022

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy

  6. 29-Jun-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam KoshyView PDF

  7. 29-Jun-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 21-Jun-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/2826/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPC 2826/2022 Court Decision: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the petition challenging a bailable warrant issued by the Chhattisgarh State Scheduled Caste Commission. The court held that the Commission possesses statutory powers under Section 10 of the Act, 1995 to issue warrants as it has all civil court powers, and thus could lawfully issue the warrant to secure petitioner's attendance after repeated summons defaults. Key Reasoning: Section 10 of the Chhattisgarh Rajya Anusuchit Jati Ayog Adhiniyam, 1995 vests the Commission with civil court powers, including enforcing attendance through warrants under CPC Section 32. The warrant was issued only to secure presence for evidence recording, not for adjudication, making it legally valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case