BHAGAT RAM GHRITALAHARE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH — WPS/4411/2026
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: CGHC010201812026
Filing Number
WPS/11621/2026
Filing Date
13-May-2026
Registration No
WPS/4411/2026
Registration Date
21-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
EQUAL PAY FOR EQUAL WORK. ( 612 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BHAGAT RAM GHRITALAHARE
Adv. Resham lal Jaiswal,GOUTAM KHETRAPAL,GOUTAM KHETRAPAL, ,Kapil Maini,Kapil Maini,Kapil Maini,GOUTAM KHETRAPAL
-
2.Chaturbhuj Diwan
-
3.Deepak
-
4.Gajanan Sinha
-
5.Jalendra Kumar Uike
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
-
2.Director, Directorate Of Ayurveda, Yoga And Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha And Homeopathy (AYUSH),,
-
3.Divisional Joint Director,Treasury, Accounts And Pension, Raipur,
-
4.Joint Secretary Finance Department Government Of Chhattisgarh,
-
5.Secretary, Government Chhattisgarh, Department Of Labour
-
6.District AYUSH Officer,
-
7.District AYUSH Officer,
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
16-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF
Case Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh adjourned WPS No. 4411/2026 on 16.06.2026 and consolidated it with the similar pending writ petition WPS No. 3775/2026 for joint hearing. Both petitions involve BHAGAT RAM GHRITALAHARE and others against the State of Chhattisgarh and AYUSH officials, with the court accepting the joint prayer of counsel for both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
-
13-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPS/4411/2026
Case Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh adjourned WPS No. 4411/2026 on 16.06.2026 and consolidated it with the similar pending writ petition WPS No. 3775/2026 for joint hearing. Both petitions involve BHAGAT RAM GHRITALAHARE and others against the State of Chhattisgarh and AYUSH officials, with the court accepting the joint prayer of counsel for both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts