GAJENDRA KASHYAP vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/2587/2026
Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 16th June 2026.
CNR: CGHC010201782026
Filing Number
WPC/11620/2026
Filing Date
13-May-2026
Registration No
WPC/2587/2026
Registration Date
15-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
16-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--WITHDRAWN
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GAJENDRA KASHYAP
Adv. Siddharth Pandey,MAHESH PANDEY,MAHESH PANDEY, ,UJJAWAL AGRAWAL,UJJAWAL AGRAWAL,UJJAWAL AGRAWAL,MAHESH PANDEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.The Deputy Registrar,
-
3.The Collector
-
4.The Primary Agricultural Credit Cooperative Society Singhanpur,
-
5.The Primary Agricultural Credit Cooperative Society Kharora,
-
6.Lalit Choudhary,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of Gajendra Kashyap's writ petition as withdrawn with liberty, allowing him to approach the District Collector with a representation seeking implementation of an approved transfer from Kharora Cooperative Society to Singhanpur Society. The court directed the Collector to decide any such application within three months in accordance with law, after providing adequate hearing and passing reasoned orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
-
13-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/2587/2026
The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of Gajendra Kashyap's writ petition as withdrawn with liberty, allowing him to approach the District Collector with a representation seeking implementation of an approved transfer from Kharora Cooperative Society to Singhanpur Society. The court directed the Collector to decide any such application within three months in accordance with law, after providing adequate hearing and passing reasoned orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts