Natvar @ Kailash Das(Out Jail) RAJESH KUMAR JAIN, SMT.KIRAN JAIN vs State Of Chhattisgarh — CRA/60/2013

Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 20-Dec-2013

CNR: CGHC010201782013

Filing Number

CRA/936/2013

Filing Date

14-Jan-2013

Registration No

CRA/60/2013

Registration Date

14-Jan-2013

Judge

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey

Coram

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS RELATING TO DRUGS & COSMETICS, NDPS ACT. ( 1416 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Natvar @ Kailash Das(Out Jail) RAJESH KUMAR JAIN, SMT.KIRAN JAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of Chhattisgarh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani DubeyView PDF

    Case Summary: CRA No. 60/2013 Natvar @ Kailash Das v. State of Chhattisgarh The High Court of Chhattisgarh affirmed Natvar's conviction under Section 20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act for possessing 8 kg of ganja seized at Bilaspur railway station in April 2012, but reduced his sentence from four years rigorous imprisonment to time already served (approximately 1 year, 4 months, 25 days). The court applied reformative sentencing principles, considering his young age at the time of offense, absence of criminal antecedents, and prolonged delay in appeal proceedings since 2013. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Dec-2013

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri

  4. 14-Jan-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRA/60/2013

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRA No. 60/2013 Natvar @ Kailash Das v. State of Chhattisgarh The High Court of Chhattisgarh affirmed Natvar's conviction under Section 20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act for possessing 8 kg of ganja seized at Bilaspur railway station in April 2012, but reduced his sentence from four years rigorous imprisonment to time already served (approximately 1 year, 4 months, 25 days). The court applied reformative sentencing principles, considering his young age at the time of offense, absence of criminal antecedents, and prolonged delay in appeal proceedings since 2013. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case