SUMIT YADAV OFFICE REFERENCE, ,ABHINAV TIWARI,MANISH UPADHYAY,ASHISH GUPTA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/1426/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010201682026

Filing Number

CRMP/8555/2026

Filing Date

13-May-2026

Registration No

CRMP/1426/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO RESTORATION / MODIFICATION / EXTENSION OF TIME IN DECIDED CRIMINAL CASE ( 1450 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUMIT YADAV OFFICE REFERENCE, ,ABHINAV TIWARI,MANISH UPADHYAY,ASHISH GUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: CRMP No. 1426 of 2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted the trial court's request for a two-month extension to conclude the trial against Sumit Yadav and co-accused. The court found the extension reasonable, noting that trial delays resulted from one accused absconding and being subsequently produced on 27.04.2026, which consumed substantial time in legal proceedings. The trial court was directed to complete the trial within two months from receiving the certified order copy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 13-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMP/1426/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRMP No. 1426 of 2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted the trial court's request for a two-month extension to conclude the trial against Sumit Yadav and co-accused. The court found the extension reasonable, noting that trial delays resulted from one accused absconding and being subsequently produced on 27.04.2026, which consumed substantial time in legal proceedings. The trial court was directed to complete the trial within two months from receiving the certified order copy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case