SHAKUNTALA PARMAR SUDHANSHU UPADHYAY, ,Sharad Mishra vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/4487/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010201232026

Filing Number

WPS/11586/2026

Filing Date

13-May-2026

Registration No

WPS/4487/2026

Registration Date

04-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

RETIRAL BENEFITS. ( 601 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHAKUNTALA PARMAR SUDHANSHU UPADHYAY, ,Sharad Mishra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.The Secretary,

  3. 3.The Secretary,

  4. 4.The Secretary,

  5. 5.The Executive Engineer,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    Case Summary - WPS 4487/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court allowed Shakuntala Parmar's petition seeking leave encashment under the Work-Charged/Contingency Paid Employees Leave Rules, 1977. The court relied on its earlier decision in Faguvaram Patel & Others (2022), affirmed by the Division Bench (2023), which allowed similar claims. The court directed respondent authorities to process claims of all similarly situated employees within 120 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

  4. 13-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/4487/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary - WPS 4487/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court allowed Shakuntala Parmar's petition seeking leave encashment under the Work-Charged/Contingency Paid Employees Leave Rules, 1977. The court relied on its earlier decision in Faguvaram Patel & Others (2022), affirmed by the Division Bench (2023), which allowed similar claims. The court directed respondent authorities to process claims of all similarly situated employees within 120 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case