NISHANT SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/1451/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010201072026

Filing Number

CRMP/8533/2026

Filing Date

13-May-2026

Registration No

CRMP/1451/2026

Registration Date

19-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

APPLICATION U/S 528 OF B.N.S.S. 2023 ( 1411 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NISHANT SAHU

    Adv. ATUL KUMAR KESHARWANI,Shakti Singh Thakur,Shakti Singh Thakur, ,VIDYA,AKASH DEEP SHARMA,R. L. RAJAK,Saket Kesharwani,Shakti Singh Thakur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Case Summary: CRMP/1451/2026 - Nishant Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh Court Decision: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Nishant Sahu's petition seeking to quash criminal proceedings, finding prima facie evidence of cheating and forgery offenses under IPC Sections 420, 467, and 34. The court rejected arguments that the dispute was purely fiscal, holding that where allegations disclose ingredients of criminal offenses, proceedings must continue to trial regardless of civil/commercial ramifications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 13-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMP/1451/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRMP/1451/2026 - Nishant Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh Court Decision: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Nishant Sahu's petition seeking to quash criminal proceedings, finding prima facie evidence of cheating and forgery offenses under IPC Sections 420, 467, and 34. The court rejected arguments that the dispute was purely fiscal, holding that where allegations disclose ingredients of criminal offenses, proceedings must continue to trial regardless of civil/commercial ramifications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case