AJEET PAIKRA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4714/2026
Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th June 2026.
CNR: CGHC010200332026
Filing Number
MCRC/8496/2026
Filing Date
13-May-2026
Registration No
MCRC/4714/2026
Registration Date
14-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
Other ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
15-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AJEET PAIKRA
Adv. Nishi Kant Sinha,SHAKTI RAJ SINHA,SHAKTI RAJ SINHA, ,SHAKTI RAJ SINHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Jun-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
Case Summary: MCRC 4714/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted bail to Ajeet Paikra, arrested for alleged involvement in a jewelry shop theft where ornaments worth Rs. 76,27,875 and cash of Rs. 75,000 were stolen. The court found that similarly situated co-accused persons had already been granted bail, the charge-sheet was filed, and the applicant had been in custody since November 2025, warranting release on parity grounds. Bail was granted with conditions including personal bond with two sureties and mandatory court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jun-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
-
13-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MCRC/4714/2026
Case Summary: MCRC 4714/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted bail to Ajeet Paikra, arrested for alleged involvement in a jewelry shop theft where ornaments worth Rs. 76,27,875 and cash of Rs. 75,000 were stolen. The court found that similarly situated co-accused persons had already been granted bail, the charge-sheet was filed, and the applicant had been in custody since November 2025, warranting release on parity grounds. Bail was granted with conditions including personal bond with two sureties and mandatory court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts