SUKANA KAVARE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/2566/2026

Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010200262026

Filing Number

WPC/11533/2026

Filing Date

13-May-2026

Registration No

WPC/2566/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ELECTION MATTERS ( 9 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO DISQUALIFICATION TO HOLD THE POSTS IN PANCHAYATS. ( 912 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--WITHDRAWN

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUKANA KAVARE

    Adv. VIKAS KUMAR PANDEY,TITRA RAM PATEL,TITRA RAM PATEL, ,ADARSH RAJPUT,TITRA RAM PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Collector, Bijapur

  3. 3.Sub Divisional Officer (R)

  4. 4.Chief Executive Officer

  5. 5.Chief Executive Officer

  6. 6.Ramesh Gota

  7. 7.Laccha Gota

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

    Case Summary: Sukana Kavare, Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Aedapalli, challenged a no-confidence motion passed against her by the Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) on 06.05.2026. The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty, permitting the petitioner to challenge the underlying SDO order through appeal before competent authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

  4. 13-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/2566/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Sukana Kavare, Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Aedapalli, challenged a no-confidence motion passed against her by the Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) on 06.05.2026. The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty, permitting the petitioner to challenge the underlying SDO order through appeal before competent authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case