SMT SUGNA MUDALIAR J.K. SAXENA, ,MD ALTAMAS ZAHEER ALI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/2630/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010200232026

Filing Number

WPC/11531/2026

Filing Date

13-May-2026

Registration No

WPC/2630/2026

Registration Date

19-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT SUGNA MUDALIAR J.K. SAXENA, ,MD ALTAMAS ZAHEER ALI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Chhattisgarh Housing Board

    Adv. Shobhit Mishra

  3. 3.Executive Engineer

  4. 4.Smt. Swati Mudaliar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

    Case Summary: WPC 2630/2026 Smt. Sugna Mudaliar, a widow, sought to quash the transfer of her housing board property to another respondent, claiming illegal dispossession and asserting her legal right of residence. After the petitioner's counsel argued briefly, the court permitted withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file appropriate applications before concerned authorities under relevant statutory provisions. The petition was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

  4. 13-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/2630/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPC 2630/2026 Smt. Sugna Mudaliar, a widow, sought to quash the transfer of her housing board property to another respondent, claiming illegal dispossession and asserting her legal right of residence. After the petitioner's counsel argued briefly, the court permitted withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file appropriate applications before concerned authorities under relevant statutory provisions. The petition was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case