SUNIL NAMDEV OFFICE REFERENCE, ,J.K. GUPTA,SUDEEP JOHRI,SYED ISHHADIL ALI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/1424/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010200202026

Filing Number

CRMP/8490/2026

Filing Date

13-May-2026

Registration No

CRMP/1424/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO RESTORATION / MODIFICATION / EXTENSION OF TIME IN DECIDED CRIMINAL CASE ( 1450 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNIL NAMDEV OFFICE REFERENCE, ,J.K. GUPTA,SUDEEP JOHRI,SYED ISHHADIL ALI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: CRMP No. 1424 of 2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted a 4-month extension for trial completion in the criminal case against Sunil Namdev, reducing the trial court's requested 6-month extension. The court noted that despite witness summons issued through the Superintendent of Police, evidence from 22 of 30 prosecution witnesses remained unrecorded due to witness non-appearance, necessitating the extension. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 13-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMP/1424/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRMP No. 1424 of 2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted a 4-month extension for trial completion in the criminal case against Sunil Namdev, reducing the trial court's requested 6-month extension. The court noted that despite witness summons issued through the Superintendent of Police, evidence from 22 of 30 prosecution witnesses remained unrecorded due to witness non-appearance, necessitating the extension. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case