MANISH DUBEY OFFICE REFERENCE, ,KARAN KUMAR BAHARANI,TANVEER ASLAM KHAN,PRAVIN KUMAR TULSYAN vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/1429/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010200192026

Filing Number

CRMP/8489/2026

Filing Date

13-May-2026

Registration No

CRMP/1429/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO RESTORATION / MODIFICATION / EXTENSION OF TIME IN DECIDED CRIMINAL CASE ( 1450 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANISH DUBEY OFFICE REFERENCE, ,KARAN KUMAR BAHARANI,TANVEER ASLAM KHAN,PRAVIN KUMAR TULSYAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of an office reference concerning criminal trial delays for petitioner Manish Dubey. The court granted the trial court's request for a two-month extension to conclude the case, finding it reasonable given that the case was at prosecution evidence stage with two witness statements still pending and witness attendance issues. The trial court was directed to conclude the trial as early as possible within the extended two-month period from receipt of the certified order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 13-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMP/1429/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of an office reference concerning criminal trial delays for petitioner Manish Dubey. The court granted the trial court's request for a two-month extension to conclude the case, finding it reasonable given that the case was at prosecution evidence stage with two witness statements still pending and witness attendance issues. The trial court was directed to conclude the trial as early as possible within the extended two-month period from receipt of the certified order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case