GIRDHARI PATEL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/4208/2022

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 16th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010199642022

Filing Number

WPS/10924/2022

Filing Date

17-Jun-2022

Registration No

WPS/4208/2022

Registration Date

21-Jun-2022

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

REMOVAL / DISMISSAL / TERMINATION FROM SERVICE. ( 603 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

16-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GIRDHARI PATEL

    Adv. Sharad Mishra,NIKHIL PARAKH,NIKHIL PARAKH, ,SANGEET KUMAR KUSHWAHA,SAURABH MISHRA,SAURABH MISHRA,SAURABH MISHRA,NIKHIL PARAKH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.The District Collector,

  3. 3.The Chief Medical and Health Officer,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

    Case Summary: WPS/4208/2022 - Girdhari Patel v. State of Chhattisgarh Girdhari Patel sought quashing of his termination order dated 31.05.2022 and reinstatement to service. The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the petition as infructuous based on the petitioner's own counsel's submission that by efflux of time, the petition had become infructuous, with no objection from the respondent state. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Jun-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh SamantView PDF

  4. 28-Jun-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh SamantView PDF

  5. 22-Jun-2022

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant

  6. 17-Jun-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/4208/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPS/4208/2022 - Girdhari Patel v. State of Chhattisgarh Girdhari Patel sought quashing of his termination order dated 31.05.2022 and reinstatement to service. The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the petition as infructuous based on the petitioner's own counsel's submission that by efflux of time, the petition had become infructuous, with no objection from the respondent state. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case