HARDIK SELARKA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/4294/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010198512026

Filing Number

WPS/11419/2026

Filing Date

12-May-2026

Registration No

WPS/4294/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

TRANSFER MATTERS. ( 617 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARDIK SELARKA

    Adv. NEETA TULSANI THAWANI,Rajesh Mishra,Rajesh Mishra, ,Lavkant Dubey,Rajesh Mishra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Commissioner

  3. 3.Chief Medical and Health Officer

  4. 4.Project Director (Operations)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    Case Summary: WPS No. 4294/2026 (Hardik Selarka v. State of Chhattisgarh) The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Hardik Selarka's petition challenging a transfer order dated 6.5.2026 that required him to be posted outside Bilaspur district. The Court held that since identical issues were already decided in WPS No. 4121/2026, the transfer policy—requiring contractual health employees completing five years of service to be reassigned outside their original district—constitutes a valid policy decision within executive authority that cannot be interfered with under Article 226, as transfer is an inherent incident of government service. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

  4. 12-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/4294/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPS No. 4294/2026 (Hardik Selarka v. State of Chhattisgarh) The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Hardik Selarka's petition challenging a transfer order dated 6.5.2026 that required him to be posted outside Bilaspur district. The Court held that since identical issues were already decided in WPS No. 4121/2026, the transfer policy—requiring contractual health employees completing five years of service to be reassigned outside their original district—constitutes a valid policy decision within executive authority that cannot be interfered with under Article 226, as transfer is an inherent incident of government service. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case