SIRIL ANTHONY vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/4263/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010198072026

Filing Number

WPS/11400/2026

Filing Date

12-May-2026

Registration No

WPS/4263/2026

Registration Date

13-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

RETIRAL BENEFITS. ( 601 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SIRIL ANTHONY

    Adv. F.S.KHARE,RAM KUMAR TIWARI,RAM KUMAR TIWARI, ,MAMTA MAHILANGE,YASHWANT MISHRA,NILU KUMARI SINGH,RAM KUMAR TIWARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Engineer in Chief

  3. 3.Chief Engineering

  4. 4.Superintending Engineer

  5. 5.Executive Engineer (E and M)

  6. 6.Joint director

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    Case Summary: WPS/4263/2026 Siril Anthony, a retired Work-Charged Mechanic (age 81), sought leave encashment under the Chhattisgarh Work-Charged/Contingency Paid Employees Leave Rules, 1977. The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the petition, directing respondent authorities to process his claim and that of all similarly placed persons within 120 days, following a favorable precedent judgment (W.P.(S) No.3870/2021) affirmed by the Division Bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

  4. 12-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/4263/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPS/4263/2026 Siril Anthony, a retired Work-Charged Mechanic (age 81), sought leave encashment under the Chhattisgarh Work-Charged/Contingency Paid Employees Leave Rules, 1977. The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the petition, directing respondent authorities to process his claim and that of all similarly placed persons within 120 days, following a favorable precedent judgment (W.P.(S) No.3870/2021) affirmed by the Division Bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case