DULAR RAM SINGRAUL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/4201/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th June 2026.
CNR: CGHC010198002026
Filing Number
WPS/11395/2026
Filing Date
12-May-2026
Registration No
WPS/4201/2026
Registration Date
13-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
RETIRAL BENEFITS. ( 601 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
15-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DULAR RAM SINGRAUL
Adv. SAMYAK SINGHAI JAIN,Mayank Kumar,Mayank Kumar, ,Mayank Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Engineer in Chief
-
3.Executive Engineer
-
4.Joint Director Treasury
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF
Case Summary: WPS 4201/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of Dular Ram Singraul's petition seeking leave encashment under the Chhattisgarh Work-Charged/Contingency Paid Employees Leave Rules, 1977. The court granted the relief, directing respondent authorities to process the petitioner's claim and that of all similarly placed persons within 120 days, relying on the earlier High Court decision in Faguvaram Patel case (affirmed on appeal) that had allowed identical claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jun-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
-
12-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPS/4201/2026
Case Summary: WPS 4201/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of Dular Ram Singraul's petition seeking leave encashment under the Chhattisgarh Work-Charged/Contingency Paid Employees Leave Rules, 1977. The court granted the relief, directing respondent authorities to process the petitioner's claim and that of all similarly placed persons within 120 days, relying on the earlier High Court decision in Faguvaram Patel case (affirmed on appeal) that had allowed identical claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts