SUNIL KUMAR JHA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/4248/2026

Disposed: Contested--NON PROSECUTION on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010197922026

Filing Number

WPS/11389/2026

Filing Date

12-May-2026

Registration No

WPS/4248/2026

Registration Date

13-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES ( 630 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--NON PROSECUTION

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNIL KUMAR JHA

    Adv. ROHIT SHARMA,RAHUL SHARMA,RAHUL SHARMA, ,RAHUL SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Additional Chief Secretary

  3. 3.Director

  4. 4.Collector Raipur

  5. 5.Chief Executive Officer

  6. 6.Committee for deciding the grievance of Panchayat Sachiv

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    Summary: WPS/4248/2026 - Sunil Kumar Jha v. State of Chhattisgarh The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the petition filed by Sunil Kumar Jha, a Panchayat Sachiv, against the State of Chhattisgarh and related officials. The court dismissed the case for want of prosecution on June 15, 2026, as the petitioner failed to appear or provide any representation despite repeated calls to press the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

  4. 12-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/4248/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: WPS/4248/2026 - Sunil Kumar Jha v. State of Chhattisgarh The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the petition filed by Sunil Kumar Jha, a Panchayat Sachiv, against the State of Chhattisgarh and related officials. The court dismissed the case for want of prosecution on June 15, 2026, as the petitioner failed to appear or provide any representation despite repeated calls to press the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case