SHYAMLAL YADAV vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/4324/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010197852026

Filing Number

WPS/11384/2026

Filing Date

12-May-2026

Registration No

WPS/4324/2026

Registration Date

15-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

RETIRAL BENEFITS. ( 601 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHYAMLAL YADAV

    Adv. MAYANK CHANDRAKAR,KESHAV DEWANGAN,KESHAV DEWANGAN, ,AKASH PANDEY,KESHAV DEWANGAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Chief Engineer

  3. 3.Superintendent Engineer

  4. 4.Joint Director

  5. 5.Executive Engineer

  6. 6.Divisional Joint Director

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed Shyamlal Yadav's writ petition seeking leave encashment under the Chhattisgarh Work-Charged/Contingency Paid Employees Leave Rules, 1977. The court directed respondent authorities to process the petitioner's claim and all similarly placed persons' claims within 120 days, relying on a prior High Court decision (W.P.S 3870/2021) that had allowed similar claims and was affirmed by the Division Bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

  4. 12-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/4324/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed Shyamlal Yadav's writ petition seeking leave encashment under the Chhattisgarh Work-Charged/Contingency Paid Employees Leave Rules, 1977. The court directed respondent authorities to process the petitioner's claim and all similarly placed persons' claims within 120 days, relying on a prior High Court decision (W.P.S 3870/2021) that had allowed similar claims and was affirmed by the Division Bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case