KUSUMAKAR RAO BHOSLE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,MANEESH SHARMA,Shruti Pramar — MCRC/4663/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010197762026

Filing Number

MCRC/8396/2026

Filing Date

12-May-2026

Registration No

MCRC/4663/2026

Registration Date

13-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KUSUMAKAR RAO BHOSLE

    Adv. AMIT KUMAR,Anil Kumar,Anil Kumar, ,SOURABH SONWANI,SOURABH SONWANI,Anushree Mishra,Anil Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,MANEESH SHARMA,Shruti Pramar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC 4663/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted bail to Kusumakar Rao Bhosle, accused of fraud and forgery involving alleged cash loans of ₹23.15 crores advanced between 2017-2024. The court found bail justified based on: completed investigation with primarily documentary evidence, applicant's lack of criminal history, and parity with co-accused Dipendra Padhi who was already granted bail in an identical case. Bail was conditioned on personal bond with two sureties and strict compliance with court attendance requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-May-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Additional Registrar(j)

  4. 12-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/4663/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC 4663/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted bail to Kusumakar Rao Bhosle, accused of fraud and forgery involving alleged cash loans of ₹23.15 crores advanced between 2017-2024. The court found bail justified based on: completed investigation with primarily documentary evidence, applicant's lack of criminal history, and parity with co-accused Dipendra Padhi who was already granted bail in an identical case. Bail was conditioned on personal bond with two sureties and strict compliance with court attendance requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case