SUNDER LAL KAUSHIK vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/4228/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010197742026

Filing Number

WPS/11379/2026

Filing Date

12-May-2026

Registration No

WPS/4228/2026

Registration Date

13-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

RETIRAL BENEFITS. ( 601 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNDER LAL KAUSHIK

    Adv. F.S.KHARE,RAM KUMAR TIWARI,RAM KUMAR TIWARI, ,YASHWANT MISHRA,MAMTA MAHILANGE,NILU KUMARI SINGH,RAM KUMAR TIWARI

  2. 2.Narmada Prasad Tiwari

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Engineer in Chief

  3. 3.Chief Engineer

  4. 4.Executive Engineer (E and M)

  5. 5.Executive Engineer

  6. 6.Joint Director

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the writ petition filed by two retired Water Resources Department employees seeking leave encashment under the Chhattisgarh Work-Charged/Contingency Paid Employees Leave Rules, 1977. The court directed respondent authorities to process their claims within 120 days, relying on a prior court decision (W.P.(S) No.3870/2021) that had allowed similar claims and was affirmed by the Division Bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

  4. 12-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/4228/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the writ petition filed by two retired Water Resources Department employees seeking leave encashment under the Chhattisgarh Work-Charged/Contingency Paid Employees Leave Rules, 1977. The court directed respondent authorities to process their claims within 120 days, relying on a prior court decision (W.P.(S) No.3870/2021) that had allowed similar claims and was affirmed by the Division Bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case