JITENDRA KUMAR SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4690/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010197732026

Filing Number

MCRC/8395/2026

Filing Date

12-May-2026

Registration No

MCRC/4690/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JITENDRA KUMAR SAHU

    Adv. ANSHIT SINGH HORA,Amrita Sharma,Amrita Sharma, ,SAHIL SAHU,RAKESH KUMAR MANIKPURI,RAKESH KUMAR MANIKPURI,AKASH AGRAWAL,Ravindra Sharma,Amrita Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted bail to Jitendra Kumar Sahu in a theft case involving Rs. 1,19,000 worth of jewelry and cash stolen from a house. The court allowed the application despite three prior criminal antecedents and a filed charge sheet, considering that the co-accused was already granted bail, the applicant had been in jail since February 2026, and trial conclusion would take considerable time. Bail was granted on a personal bond with two sureties and strict conditions including mandatory court attendance and no adjournment requests during witness examinations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 12-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/4690/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted bail to Jitendra Kumar Sahu in a theft case involving Rs. 1,19,000 worth of jewelry and cash stolen from a house. The court allowed the application despite three prior criminal antecedents and a filed charge sheet, considering that the co-accused was already granted bail, the applicant had been in jail since February 2026, and trial conclusion would take considerable time. Bail was granted on a personal bond with two sureties and strict conditions including mandatory court attendance and no adjournment requests during witness examinations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case