VINAY MISHRA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/4240/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 15th June 2026.
CNR: CGHC010197352026
Filing Number
WPS/11356/2026
Filing Date
12-May-2026
Registration No
WPS/4240/2026
Registration Date
13-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
TRANSFER MATTERS. ( 617 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
15-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VINAY MISHRA
Adv. NEETA TULSANI THAWANI,Rajesh Mishra,Rajesh Mishra, ,Lavkant Dubey,Rajesh Mishra
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Commissioner
-
3.Chief Medical and Health Officer
-
4.Project Director (Operations)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF
Case Summary: WPS/4240/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed Vinay Mishra's petition challenging a transfer order dated 6.5.2026 that sought to relocate him from his posting in Balodabazar-Bhatapara district. The court held that transfer/posting is an inherent incident of government service and falls within the executive's policy-making domain, which courts cannot ordinarily interfere with under Article 226 unless vitiated by mala fides or statutory violation. The court applied its prior judgment in WPS 4121/2026, which upheld the State Nodal Agency's resolution requiring contractual health workers with five years of service to be posted outside their current district, and dismissed the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jun-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
-
12-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPS/4240/2026
Case Summary: WPS/4240/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed Vinay Mishra's petition challenging a transfer order dated 6.5.2026 that sought to relocate him from his posting in Balodabazar-Bhatapara district. The court held that transfer/posting is an inherent incident of government service and falls within the executive's policy-making domain, which courts cannot ordinarily interfere with under Article 226 unless vitiated by mala fides or statutory violation. The court applied its prior judgment in WPS 4121/2026, which upheld the State Nodal Agency's resolution requiring contractual health workers with five years of service to be posted outside their current district, and dismissed the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts