MANOJ KUMAR SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/4267/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 15th June 2026.
CNR: CGHC010197302026
Filing Number
WPS/11352/2026
Filing Date
12-May-2026
Registration No
WPS/4267/2026
Registration Date
13-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
TRANSFER MATTERS. ( 617 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
15-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANOJ KUMAR SAHU
Adv. NEETA TULSANI THAWANI,Rajesh Mishra,Rajesh Mishra, ,Lavkant Dubey,Rajesh Mishra
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Commissioner
-
3.Chief Medical and Health Officer
-
4.Project Director (Operations)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF
Case Summary: WPS 4267/2026 Manoj Kumar Sahu, a District Project Coordinator, challenged a transfer order dated May 6, 2026, seeking to continue his posting in Bemetara. The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the petition, holding that the identical issue had already been decided in WPS 4121/2026. The court upheld the State Nodal Agency's policy decision requiring employees with five years' service to be transferred outside their current district, reasoning that transfer is a routine incident of government service and courts cannot interfere with policy decisions absent mala fides or statutory violation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jun-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
-
12-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPS/4267/2026
Case Summary: WPS 4267/2026 Manoj Kumar Sahu, a District Project Coordinator, challenged a transfer order dated May 6, 2026, seeking to continue his posting in Bemetara. The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the petition, holding that the identical issue had already been decided in WPS 4121/2026. The court upheld the State Nodal Agency's policy decision requiring employees with five years' service to be transferred outside their current district, reasoning that transfer is a routine incident of government service and courts cannot interfere with policy decisions absent mala fides or statutory violation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts