RAMJEET vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH — WPC/2592/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010196842026

Filing Number

WPC/11311/2026

Filing Date

11-May-2026

Registration No

WPC/2592/2026

Registration Date

15-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO ENCROACHMENTS ON GOVERNMENT LAND AND DEMOLITION OF BUILDINGS. ( 1708 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMJEET

    Adv. Nishi Kant Sinha,SHAKTI RAJ SINHA,SHAKTI RAJ SINHA, ,SHAKTI RAJ SINHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

  2. 2.Collector District Surguja

  3. 3.Tahsildar Lundra (Dhourpur)

  4. 4.Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Amdi Tahsil Lundra (Dhourpur)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of Ramjeet's writ petition seeking land patta (ownership deed) for 0.020 hectare in Village Amdi, Surguja district. The court directed the Collector (Respondent No. 2) to decide the petitioner's application dated 7.5.2026 within four months in accordance with law, with no coercive action against the petitioner pending such decision. The court clarified it expressed no opinion on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

  4. 11-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/2592/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of Ramjeet's writ petition seeking land patta (ownership deed) for 0.020 hectare in Village Amdi, Surguja district. The court directed the Collector (Respondent No. 2) to decide the petitioner's application dated 7.5.2026 within four months in accordance with law, with no coercive action against the petitioner pending such decision. The court clarified it expressed no opinion on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case