JAGDISHRAM SAHU vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Advocate - Shaleen Singh Baghel — WPS/4286/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010196712026

Filing Number

WPS/11298/2026

Filing Date

11-May-2026

Registration No

WPS/4286/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

RETIRAL BENEFITS. ( 601 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAGDISHRAM SAHU

    Adv. PARAG KOTECHA,Bhavika Kotecha,Bhavika Kotecha, ,TANUSHA PATHAK,Bhavika Kotecha

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Advocate - Shaleen Singh Baghel

  2. 2.Commissioner

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    Case Summary: WPS/4286/2026 Jagdishram Sahu, a 63-year-old retired labour worker, filed a writ petition against Rajnandgaon Municipal Corporation seeking release of all retiral dues (gratuity, provident fund, leave encashment) with 12% interest on delayed payment. The petitioner retired on 31.07.2025 but had not received dues even 11 months later. The court disposed of the petition by directing the respondents to disburse all entitled retiral dues within three months from the order date of 15.06.2026, noting no dispute existed regarding the petitioner's entitlement—delay was attributed to fund shortage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

  4. 11-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/4286/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPS/4286/2026 Jagdishram Sahu, a 63-year-old retired labour worker, filed a writ petition against Rajnandgaon Municipal Corporation seeking release of all retiral dues (gratuity, provident fund, leave encashment) with 12% interest on delayed payment. The petitioner retired on 31.07.2025 but had not received dues even 11 months later. The court disposed of the petition by directing the respondents to disburse all entitled retiral dues within three months from the order date of 15.06.2026, noting no dispute existed regarding the petitioner's entitlement—delay was attributed to fund shortage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case