MAHESH MISHRA vs BHAGIRATHI BANJARE Advocate - A.G. — WP227/614/2026
Disposed: Contested--INFRUCTUOUS on 16th June 2026.
CNR: CGHC010196352026
Filing Number
WP227/11262/2026
Filing Date
11-May-2026
Registration No
WP227/614/2026
Registration Date
15-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
16-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--INFRUCTUOUS
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAHESH MISHRA
Adv. Lukesh Kumar Mishra,Vinay Nagdev,Vinay Nagdev, ,MANOJ KUMAR YADAV,MANOJ KUMAR YADAV,MANOJ KUMAR YADAV,MANOJ KUMAR YADAV,GIRISH SAHU,AKASH MISHRA,Vinay Nagdev
Respondent(s)
-
1.BHAGIRATHI BANJARE Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Samaarin Bai
-
3.Kamla Bai
-
4.Savitri Bai
-
5.Panihaarin Bai
-
6.Smt. Santoshi Yadav
-
7.State Of Chhattisgarh Through -District Collector
Adv. A.G.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
Case Summary (WP227/614/2026): The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition filed by Mahesh Mishra against Bhagirathi Banjare and others as "not pressed." The petitioner's counsel submitted that the underlying civil suit had already been decided by the trial court, rendering the writ petition infructuous, and declined to pursue it further. Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal accepted this submission and dismissed the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
-
11-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP227/614/2026
Case Summary (WP227/614/2026): The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition filed by Mahesh Mishra against Bhagirathi Banjare and others as "not pressed." The petitioner's counsel submitted that the underlying civil suit had already been decided by the trial court, rendering the writ petition infructuous, and declined to pursue it further. Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal accepted this submission and dismissed the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts