BHARTENDU PANDEY vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/4338/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010196292026

Filing Number

WPS/11256/2026

Filing Date

11-May-2026

Registration No

WPS/4338/2026

Registration Date

15-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

RETIRAL BENEFITS. ( 601 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHARTENDU PANDEY

    Adv. HEMANT KESHARWANI,SWAPNIL KESHARI,SWAPNIL KESHARI, ,SWAPNIL KESHARI,SWAPNIL KESHARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Engineer In Chief

  3. 3.Chief Engineer

  4. 4.Executive Engineer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed retired Time Keeper Bhartendu Pandey's writ petition seeking leave encashment under the Chhattisgarh Work-Charged/Contingency Paid Employees Leave Rules, 1977. The court directed the Water Resource Department to process the petitioner's claim and similarly situated employees' claims within 120 days, relying on its prior precedential decision in Faguvaram Patel case that had been affirmed by the Division Bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

  4. 11-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/4338/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed retired Time Keeper Bhartendu Pandey's writ petition seeking leave encashment under the Chhattisgarh Work-Charged/Contingency Paid Employees Leave Rules, 1977. The court directed the Water Resource Department to process the petitioner's claim and similarly situated employees' claims within 120 days, relying on its prior precedential decision in Faguvaram Patel case that had been affirmed by the Division Bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case