SUKUMAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRCA/893/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010195722026

Filing Number

MCRCA/8360/2026

Filing Date

11-May-2026

Registration No

MCRCA/893/2026

Registration Date

16-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUKUMAR

    Adv. KAMLESH KUMAR PANDEY,AMITESH KUMAR PANDEY,AMITESH KUMAR PANDEY, ,KHILENDRA SAHU,KHILENDRA SAHU,KHILENDRA SAHU,KHILENDRA SAHU

  2. 2.Sangram Singh Ratre

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRCA 893/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to Sukumar and Sangram Singh Ratre, who were accused of diesel theft from a parked trailer truck on August 8, 2025. The court relied on the fact that a co-accused in the same case had been granted bail by the Supreme Court, and considered that investigation and trial would take considerable time. The applicants were released on personal bond with surety, subject to conditions including mandatory court appearances, non-interference with witnesses, and abstention from similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 11-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRCA/893/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRCA 893/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to Sukumar and Sangram Singh Ratre, who were accused of diesel theft from a parked trailer truck on August 8, 2025. The court relied on the fact that a co-accused in the same case had been granted bail by the Supreme Court, and considered that investigation and trial would take considerable time. The applicants were released on personal bond with surety, subject to conditions including mandatory court appearances, non-interference with witnesses, and abstention from similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case