CHHABI RAM SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/4348/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 16th June 2026.
CNR: CGHC010194622026
Filing Number
WPS/11176/2026
Filing Date
11-May-2026
Registration No
WPS/4348/2026
Registration Date
15-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
RETIRAL BENEFITS. ( 601 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
16-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHHABI RAM SAHU
Adv. HEMANT KESHARWANI,AAKASH SINGH,AAKASH SINGH, ,SWAPNIL KESHARI,Akhand Pratap
-
2.Basant Sahu
-
3.Satvantin Bai
-
4.Rameshar Sahu
-
5.Uderam Yadav
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Egnineer In Chief
-
3.Chief Engineer
-
4.Executive Engineer
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF
Case Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the writ petition of five retired work-charged employees seeking leave encashment under the Chhattisgarh Work-Charged/Contingency Paid Employees Leave Rules, 1977. Justice Bibhu Datta Guru directed respondent authorities to process claims of all similarly placed persons within 120 days, following an earlier court decision in Faguvaram Patel & Others (2022) that was affirmed by the Division Bench in 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
-
11-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPS/4348/2026
Case Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the writ petition of five retired work-charged employees seeking leave encashment under the Chhattisgarh Work-Charged/Contingency Paid Employees Leave Rules, 1977. Justice Bibhu Datta Guru directed respondent authorities to process claims of all similarly placed persons within 120 days, following an earlier court decision in Faguvaram Patel & Others (2022) that was affirmed by the Division Bench in 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts