KHALID USMAN MEMON vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/1421/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010194202026

Filing Number

CRMP/8264/2026

Filing Date

11-May-2026

Registration No

CRMP/1421/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO QUASHING OF FIR / CHALLAN ( 1446 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 29-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KHALID USMAN MEMON

    Adv. UDIT KHATRI,AMAN PANDEY,AMAN PANDEY, ,Ramayan Yadav,ROHISHEK VERMA,AMAN PANDEY

  2. 2.Shahida Khalid Memon

  3. 3.Juned Khalid Memon

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Roofiza Dayala

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu,Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

    Case Summary: CRMP 1421/2026 On 19/05/2026, the High Court of Chhattisgarh issued notices to both respondents (State and Roofiza Dayala) with returnable date within 3 weeks. The case was adjourned to the week commencing 15/06/2026. Applications for urgent hearing and summer vacation hearing were disposed of. No substantive relief was granted at this preliminary stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

  4. 11-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMP/1421/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRMP 1421/2026 On 19/05/2026, the High Court of Chhattisgarh issued notices to both respondents (State and Roofiza Dayala) with returnable date within 3 weeks. The case was adjourned to the week commencing 15/06/2026. Applications for urgent hearing and summer vacation hearing were disposed of. No substantive relief was granted at this preliminary stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case