DEVLAL VERMA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4717/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010192182026

Filing Number

MCRC/8160/2026

Filing Date

08-May-2026

Registration No

MCRC/4717/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEVLAL VERMA

    Adv. Lukesh Kumar Mishra,Vinay Nagdev,Vinay Nagdev, ,MANOJ KUMAR YADAV,GIRISH SAHU,AKASH MISHRA,Vinay Nagdev

  2. 2.Ajay Thakur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC 4717/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted bail to Devlal Verma and Ajay Thakur, arrested for armed robbery of ₹66.25 lakhs and gold chains in Crime No. 42/2025. The court found their cases identical to co-accused Shahid Taj and Manuraj Mourya, who were already granted bail, and noted the applicants had no prior criminal record, clean conduct during one-year incarceration, and that trial completion would take considerable time. Bail was granted on parity grounds with conditions including personal bond with sureties and strict trial attendance obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 08-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/4717/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC 4717/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted bail to Devlal Verma and Ajay Thakur, arrested for armed robbery of ₹66.25 lakhs and gold chains in Crime No. 42/2025. The court found their cases identical to co-accused Shahid Taj and Manuraj Mourya, who were already granted bail, and noted the applicants had no prior criminal record, clean conduct during one-year incarceration, and that trial completion would take considerable time. Bail was granted on parity grounds with conditions including personal bond with sureties and strict trial attendance obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case