PREETHY MARY vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/1430/2026

Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010191892026

Filing Number

CRMP/8138/2026

Filing Date

08-May-2026

Registration No

CRMP/1430/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO QUASHING OF FIR / CHALLAN ( 1446 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--WITHDRAWN

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PREETHY MARY

    Adv. B.GOPA KUMAR,HIMANSHU PANDEY,HIMANSHU PANDEY, ,HIMANSHU PANDEY,HIMANSHU PANDEY,HIMANSHU PANDEY

  2. 2.Vandana Francis

  3. 3.Sukhman Mandavi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Case Summary: CRMP No. 1430/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the petition filed by Preethy Mary, Vandana Francis, and Sukhman Mandavi seeking to quash FIR No. 60/2025 registered at GRP Bhilai on a procedural ground. The court found that the petitioners failed to implead the original complainant as a necessary party respondent to the petition. The court dismissed the petition with liberty to refile after impleading all required parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 08-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMP/1430/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRMP No. 1430/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the petition filed by Preethy Mary, Vandana Francis, and Sukhman Mandavi seeking to quash FIR No. 60/2025 registered at GRP Bhilai on a procedural ground. The court found that the petitioners failed to implead the original complainant as a necessary party respondent to the petition. The court dismissed the petition with liberty to refile after impleading all required parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case